MyBabes vs Candy AI: video, voice, mobile and pricing compared

Desk research: this article is based on the published pricing, help pages and documentation of the services named, checked in late August and early September 2026. AI Companion Radar takes no money from any app and uses no affiliate links.

Candy AI and MyBabes sit in the same part of the market: uncensored AI companions with image and video generation, priced as a subscription plus tokens. Candy is the larger and older of the two and is operated by EverAI Limited in Malta; MyBabes is run by Memora AI s.r.o. in Prague and is the newer, more video-focused platform. Neither is clearly better; they are better at different things.

At a glance

Chat and memory

Both platforms offer uncensored roleplay with unlimited messages once you subscribe. The recurring complaint about Candy in user reviews is repetition: the same flirtatious phrasing surfacing across characters and sessions, and the sense that the model is steering conversation towards paid media. Its memory is also partly token-gated, so the companion “remembering” details is not entirely free. MyBabes advertises long-term memory as a standard feature on paid plans, and its Story maker lets you set up structured scenarios rather than open-ended flirting. We would give MyBabes a narrow edge for anyone who wants the conversation itself to be the product, while noting that neither platform is the best pure-chat choice on the market; OurDream and Janitor AI both do more in that department.

Images

This is close. Candy’s image generation is one of its genuine strengths and is the reason many people stay. MyBabes counters with resolution up to 2K, a flat cost of one token per image and a “Visual Identity Anchor” that keeps a character’s face consistent across generations, which matters if you are building a recurring character rather than generating one-offs. Both support realistic and anime styles. Call it a draw on output and a small win for MyBabes on predictability of cost.

Video

Candy introduced “Live Action” video in early 2026, with clips up to 120 seconds, and it is a real feature rather than a gimmick. MyBabes, however, is built around video: it names its engines (Seedance 2.0 and 2.5, plus WAN 2.7 including an NSFW-tuned variant), publishes resolution ceilings (1080p or 2K as standard, 4K on Seedance 2.0) and publishes the per-second token cost. Being able to pick the engine and know that a five-second clip will cost 15 to 25 tokens is a different level of control from Candy’s approach. If video is your primary reason for paying, MyBabes wins this category.

Voice

Candy wins here without much argument. It offers voice messages and live voice calls with its characters, metered against your token balance. MyBabes has voice output but nothing equivalent to a call. If talking rather than typing is central to how you want to use a companion, that settles it.

Mobile

Neither app is in the Apple or Google store; both are web apps. The difference is emphasis. Candy’s site is built for phones, with step-by-step instructions for adding it to an iOS or Android home screen as a web app, and its features are designed to be used one-handed. MyBabes works in a phone browser but is evidently designed for a desktop screen, and generating video on a phone is slow going. Candy takes this category.

Pricing and free tier

On headline price, Candy is cheaper: around €13.99 a month, roughly €8.99 a month on a three-month plan, and a heavily promoted annual rate of about €3.99 a month. MyBabes Premium is €14.99 (€9.99 on the quarterly plan) and Ultra €34.99 (€23.33 quarterly). The catch with Candy is that images, voice and video all consume tokens bought on top, the per-action rates are not laid out as plainly, and user reports consistently describe real monthly spend well above the sticker price. MyBabes bundles a defined allowance (500 or 900 tokens) and publishes what each action costs, so you can budget before you buy. It also has a proper free tier without a card, where Candy offers a limited trial. Candy wins on the cheapest possible entry price; MyBabes wins on knowing what you will actually pay.

Content policy and payment

Both are adult platforms with an 18+ requirement and a prohibition on any content resembling minors. Candy accepts cryptocurrency (BTC, ETH, USDC and others) alongside cards and bills under a discreet descriptor, which some users value. MyBabes takes cards through standard processors.

Verdict by use case

• Video generation: MyBabes. Named engines, published per-second costs, higher resolution options.

• Voice calls: Candy AI. MyBabes has no comparable feature.

• Using it mainly on a phone: Candy AI.

• Trying before paying: MyBabes, for its card-free free tier.

• Lowest headline price: Candy AI on its annual promotion.

• Predictable monthly bill: MyBabes, for its published token costs.

• Image generation: either; MyBabes if you need a consistent character.

• Paying by crypto: Candy AI.

If you were to keep only one, our reading is that MyBabes is the stronger platform for people who want to make things, and Candy the stronger one for people who want to talk. Both have real weaknesses: Candy’s repetitive chat and token creep, MyBabes’s desktop bias and lack of voice calls.